|
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Hobbit Or Hoax? |
||||||||||
It’s
another earth-shattering discovery. This time
a “3ft-tall ‘hobbit’ rewrites the
history of mankind”. [1]
Promoters of Darwinism are very enthusiastic.
Another “missing-link” has been
discovered. This monkey-faced human-like
hobbit is our cousin, they say. Richard
Dawkins from I
was in |
||||||||||
Here’s
how the article was introduced: Scientists
are celebrating the most important breakthrough in
anthropology for a century: the discovery of a new
species of apeman. Described as a human
“hobbit”, the ape-man grew no taller than about
3 feet and had brains the size of grapefruits. They
lived along prehistoric man for thousands of years
before they died out in the dense jungles of What
is there about “Flores Man” that has convinced
evolutionists to believe they have now discovered
the “mother-of-all-missing-links”? The answer to
that question was found in the article:
“Scientists said this new species named Homo
floresiensis or Flores Man, calls into question the
very nature of what it means to be human, because of
its extraordinary dwarfed features and tiny
brain”. [5]
By evolutionary standards, the date assigned to “Flores Man” is quite recent – 18,000 years old. Although the fossil is small it is perfectly proportioned. At first, researchers thought she (apparently Flores Man was a she and not a he) was a child. However, closed skull sutures and wear of the teeth suggested that she was about thirty when she died. [6] |
||||||||||
"Hobbit" Skull - Human Skull |
||||||||||
“This
is unequivocal evidence that another species of
human was living at the same time as our recent
ancestors,” scientific experts said. Further,
based on when the creatures were estimated to have
lived, this would suggest the “hobbit” would
have lived along side modern humans. [7] Five
days after the initial announcement The
Daily Mail, another Irish newspaper, ran a full
page spread. This time the heading stated: “The
Hobbit Who Shook The World: The sensational
revelation this week that 3 foot high humanoids
flourished only 18,000 years ago and may still exist
in remote jungles has awesome implications: no
longer can we assume that we are unique…” [8] Did
you note carefully the phrase “may still exist in
remote jungles”? What would be so shocking about
this? There are miniature humans who live today in
various parts of the world – we call them pygmies.
But they are humans like us, not part-ape. Since
the time of Meanwhile,
the evolutionary community will have to be satisfied
with the artist’s conception of what Flores Man
“may have looked like” – a human body with a
monkey-face – based on a skull that looks just
like modern man, only smaller. I
would suggest we will see more and more artist’s
conceptions of ape-human creatures in the future. I
call this evolution propaganda. Don’t be deceived.
|
||||||||||
Understand The Times is an independent non-profit organization in
Canada and the United States.
|